# Library HoTT.Basics.Overture

# Basic definitions of homotopy type theory, particularly the groupoid structure of identity types.

Import the file of reserved notations so we maintain consistent level notations throughout the library
Require Export Basics.Notations Basics.Datatypes Basics.Logic.

Declare ML Module "number_string_notation_plugin".

Declare ML Module "number_string_notation_plugin".

Keywords for blacklisting from search function

Add Search Blacklist "_admitted" "_subproof" "Private_".

Create HintDb rewrite discriminated.

#[export] Hint Variables Opaque : rewrite.

Create HintDb typeclass_instances discriminated.

Create HintDb rewrite discriminated.

#[export] Hint Variables Opaque : rewrite.

Create HintDb typeclass_instances discriminated.

## Type classes

Local Set Typeclasses Strict Resolution.

This command prevents Coq from automatically defining the eliminator functions for inductive types. We will define them ourselves to match the naming scheme of the HoTT Book. In principle we ought to make this Global, but unfortunately the tactics induction and elim assume that the eliminators are named in Coq's way, e.g. thing_rect, so making it global could cause unpleasant surprises for people defining new inductive types. However, when you do define your own inductive types you are encouraged to also do Local Unset Elimination Schemes and then use Scheme to define thing_ind, thing_rec, and (for compatibility with induction and elim) thing_rect, as we have done below for paths, Empty, Unit, etc. We are hoping that this will be fixed eventually; see https://coq.inria.fr/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3745.

Local Unset Elimination Schemes.

This command changes Coq's subterm selection to always use full conversion after finding a subterm whose head/key matches the key of the term we're looking for. This applies to rewrite and higher-order unification in apply/elim/destruct. Again, if you don't know what that means, ignore it.

Global Set Keyed Unification.

This command makes it so that you don't have to declare universes explicitly when mentioning them in the type. (Without this command, if you want to say Definition foo := Type@{i}., you must instead say Definition foo@{i} := Type@{i}..

Global Unset Strict Universe Declaration.

This command makes it so that when we say something like IsHSet nat we get IsHSet@{i} nat instead of IsHSet@{Set} nat.

Global Unset Universe Minimization ToSet.

Force to use bullets in proofs.

Global Set Default Goal Selector "!".

Currently Coq doesn't print equivalences correctly (8.6). This fixes that. See https://github.com/HoTT/HoTT/issues/1000

Global Set Printing Primitive Projection Parameters.

This tells Coq that when we Require a module without Importing it, typeclass instances defined in that module should also not be imported. In other words, the only effect of Require without Import is to make qualified names available.

Global Set Loose Hint Behavior "Strict".

Apply using the same opacity information as typeclass proof search.

Ltac class_apply c := autoapply c with typeclass_instances.

Definition Relation (A : Type) := A → A → Type.

Class Reflexive {A} (R : Relation A) :=

reflexivity : ∀ x : A, R x x.

Arguments reflexivity {A R} _.

Class Symmetric {A} (R : Relation A) :=

symmetry : ∀ x y, R x y → R y x.

Arguments symmetry {A R _ _}.

Class Transitive {A} (R : Relation A) :=

transitivity : ∀ x y z, R x y → R y z → R x z.

Arguments transitivity {A R _ _ _}.

Definition Relation (A : Type) := A → A → Type.

Class Reflexive {A} (R : Relation A) :=

reflexivity : ∀ x : A, R x x.

Arguments reflexivity {A R} _.

Class Symmetric {A} (R : Relation A) :=

symmetry : ∀ x y, R x y → R y x.

Arguments symmetry {A R _ _}.

Class Transitive {A} (R : Relation A) :=

transitivity : ∀ x y z, R x y → R y z → R x z.

Arguments transitivity {A R _ _ _}.

A PreOrder is both Reflexive and Transitive.

Class PreOrder {A} (R : Relation A) :=

{ PreOrder_Reflexive : Reflexive R | 2 ;

PreOrder_Transitive : Transitive R | 2 }.

Global Existing Instance PreOrder_Reflexive.

Global Existing Instance PreOrder_Transitive.

Arguments reflexivity {A R _} / _.

Arguments symmetry {A R _} / _ _ _.

Arguments transitivity {A R _} / {_ _ _} _ _.

{ PreOrder_Reflexive : Reflexive R | 2 ;

PreOrder_Transitive : Transitive R | 2 }.

Global Existing Instance PreOrder_Reflexive.

Global Existing Instance PreOrder_Transitive.

Arguments reflexivity {A R _} / _.

Arguments symmetry {A R _} / _ _ _.

Arguments transitivity {A R _} / {_ _ _} _ _.

Above, we have made reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity reduce under cbn/simpl to their underlying instances. This allows the tactics to build proof terms referencing, e.g., concat. We use change after the fact to make sure that we didn't cbn away the original form of the relation.
If we want to remove the use of cbn, we can play tricks with Module Types and Modules to declare inverse directly as an instance of Symmetric without changing its type. Then we can simply unfold symmetry. See the comments around the definition of inverse.
Overwrite reflexivity so that we use our version of Reflexive rather than having the tactic look for it in the standard library. We make use of the built-in reflexivity to handle, e.g., single-constructor inductives.

Ltac old_reflexivity := reflexivity.

Tactic Notation "reflexivity" :=

old_reflexivity

|| (intros;

let R := match goal with |- ?R ?x ?y ⇒ constr:(R) end in

let pre_proof_term_head := constr:(@reflexivity _ R _) in

let proof_term_head := (eval cbn in pre_proof_term_head) in

apply (proof_term_head : ∀ x, R x x)).

Tactic Notation "reflexivity" :=

old_reflexivity

|| (intros;

let R := match goal with |- ?R ?x ?y ⇒ constr:(R) end in

let pre_proof_term_head := constr:(@reflexivity _ R _) in

let proof_term_head := (eval cbn in pre_proof_term_head) in

apply (proof_term_head : ∀ x, R x x)).

Even if we weren't using cbn, we would have to redefine symmetry, since the built-in Coq version is sometimes too smart for its own good, and will occasionally fail when it should not.

Tactic Notation "symmetry" :=

let R := match goal with |- ?R ?x ?y ⇒ constr:(R) end in

let x := match goal with |- ?R ?x ?y ⇒ constr:(x) end in

let y := match goal with |- ?R ?x ?y ⇒ constr:(y) end in

let pre_proof_term_head := constr:(@symmetry _ R _) in

let proof_term_head := (eval cbn in pre_proof_term_head) in

refine (proof_term_head y x _); change (R y x).

Tactic Notation "etransitivity" open_constr(y) :=

let R := match goal with |- ?R ?x ?z ⇒ constr:(R) end in

let x := match goal with |- ?R ?x ?z ⇒ constr:(x) end in

let z := match goal with |- ?R ?x ?z ⇒ constr:(z) end in

let pre_proof_term_head := constr:(@transitivity _ R _) in

let proof_term_head := (eval cbn in pre_proof_term_head) in

refine (proof_term_head x y z _ _); [ change (R x y) | change (R y z) ].

Tactic Notation "etransitivity" := etransitivity _.

let R := match goal with |- ?R ?x ?y ⇒ constr:(R) end in

let x := match goal with |- ?R ?x ?y ⇒ constr:(x) end in

let y := match goal with |- ?R ?x ?y ⇒ constr:(y) end in

let pre_proof_term_head := constr:(@symmetry _ R _) in

let proof_term_head := (eval cbn in pre_proof_term_head) in

refine (proof_term_head y x _); change (R y x).

Tactic Notation "etransitivity" open_constr(y) :=

let R := match goal with |- ?R ?x ?z ⇒ constr:(R) end in

let x := match goal with |- ?R ?x ?z ⇒ constr:(x) end in

let z := match goal with |- ?R ?x ?z ⇒ constr:(z) end in

let pre_proof_term_head := constr:(@transitivity _ R _) in

let proof_term_head := (eval cbn in pre_proof_term_head) in

refine (proof_term_head x y z _ _); [ change (R x y) | change (R y z) ].

Tactic Notation "etransitivity" := etransitivity _.

We redefine transitivity to work without needing to include Setoid or be using Leibniz equality, and to give proofs that unfold to concat.

Tactic Notation "transitivity" constr(x) := etransitivity x.

Define Type₁ (really, Type_i for any i > 0) so that we can enforce having universes that are not Set. In trunk, universes will not be unified with Set in most places, so we want to never use Set at all.

Definition Type1@{i} := Eval hnf in let gt := (Set : Type@{i}) in Type@{i}.

Arguments Type1 / .

Identity Coercion unfold_Type1 : Type1 >-> Sortclass.

Arguments Type1 / .

Identity Coercion unfold_Type1 : Type1 >-> Sortclass.

We also define "the next couple of universes", which are actually an arbitrary universe with another one or two strictly below it. Note when giving universe annotations to these that their universe parameters appear in order of *decreasing* size.

Definition Type2@{i j} := Eval hnf in let gt := (Type1@{j} : Type@{i}) in Type@{i}.

Arguments Type2 / .

Identity Coercion unfold_Type2 : Type2 >-> Sortclass.

Definition Type3@{i j k} := Eval hnf in let gt := (Type2@{j k} : Type@{i}) in Type@{i}.

Arguments Type3 / .

Identity Coercion unfold_Type3 : Type3 >-> Sortclass.

Arguments Type2 / .

Identity Coercion unfold_Type2 : Type2 >-> Sortclass.

Definition Type3@{i j k} := Eval hnf in let gt := (Type2@{j k} : Type@{i}) in Type@{i}.

Arguments Type3 / .

Identity Coercion unfold_Type3 : Type3 >-> Sortclass.

Along the same lines, here is a universe with an extra universe parameter that's less than or equal to it in size. The gt isn't necessary to force the larger universe to be bigger than Set (since we refer to the smaller universe by Type1 which is already bigger than Set), but we include it anyway to make the universe parameters occur again in (now non-strictly) decreasing order.

Definition Type2le@{i j} :=

Eval hnf in

let gt := (Set : Type@{i}) in

let ge := ((fun x ⇒ x) : Type1@{j} → Type@{i}) in

Type@{i}.

Arguments Type2le / .

Identity Coercion unfold_Type2le : Type2le >-> Sortclass.

Definition Type3le@{i j k} :=

Eval hnf in

let gt := (Set : Type@{i}) in

let ge := ((fun x ⇒ x) : Type2le@{j k} → Type@{i}) in

Type@{i}.

Arguments Type3le / .

Identity Coercion unfold_Type3le : Type3le >-> Sortclass.

Eval hnf in

let gt := (Set : Type@{i}) in

let ge := ((fun x ⇒ x) : Type1@{j} → Type@{i}) in

Type@{i}.

Arguments Type2le / .

Identity Coercion unfold_Type2le : Type2le >-> Sortclass.

Definition Type3le@{i j k} :=

Eval hnf in

let gt := (Set : Type@{i}) in

let ge := ((fun x ⇒ x) : Type2le@{j k} → Type@{i}) in

Type@{i}.

Arguments Type3le / .

Identity Coercion unfold_Type3le : Type3le >-> Sortclass.

We make the identity map a notation so we do not have to unfold it,
or complicate matters with its type.

Record sig {A} (P : A → Type) := exist {

proj1 : A ;

proj2 : P proj1 ;

}.

Scheme sig_rect := Induction for sig Sort Type.

Scheme sig_ind := Induction for sig Sort Type.

Scheme sig_rec := Minimality for sig Sort Type.

Arguments sig_ind {_ _}.

proj1 : A ;

proj2 : P proj1 ;

}.

Scheme sig_rect := Induction for sig Sort Type.

Scheme sig_ind := Induction for sig Sort Type.

Scheme sig_rec := Minimality for sig Sort Type.

Arguments sig_ind {_ _}.

We make the parameters maximally inserted so that we can pass around pr1 as a function and have it actually mean "first projection" in, e.g., ap.

Arguments exist {A}%type P%type _ _.

Arguments proj1 {A P} _ / .

Arguments proj2 {A P} _ / .

Arguments sig (A P)%type.

Notation "{ x | P }" := (sig (fun x ⇒ P)) : type_scope.

Notation "{ x : A | P }" := (sig (A := A) (fun x ⇒ P)) : type_scope.

Notation "'exists' x .. y , p" := (sig (fun x ⇒ .. (sig (fun y ⇒ p)) ..)) : type_scope.

Notation "{ x : A & P }" := (sig (fun x:A ⇒ P)) : type_scope.

This let's us pattern match sigma types in let expressions

Add Printing Let sig.

#[export] Hint Resolve exist : core.

#[export] Hint Resolve exist : core.

We define notation for dependent pairs because it is too annoying to write and see exist P x y all the time. However, we put it in its own scope, because sometimes it is necessary to give the particular dependent type, so we'd like to be able to turn off this notation selectively.

Notation "( x ; y )" := (exist _ x y) : fibration_scope.

Notation "( x ; .. ; y ; z )" := (exist _ x .. (exist _ y z) ..) : fibration_scope.

Notation "( x ; .. ; y ; z )" := (exist _ x .. (exist _ y z) ..) : fibration_scope.

We bind fibration_scope with sig so that we are automatically in fibration_scope when we are passing an argument of type sig.

The following notation is very convenient, although it unfortunately clashes with Proof General's "electric period". We have added format specifiers in Notations.v so that it will display without an extra space, as x.1 rather than as x .1.

Notation "x .1" := (pr1 x) : fibration_scope.

Notation "x .2" := (pr2 x) : fibration_scope.

Definition uncurry {A B C} (f : A → B → C) (p : A × B) : C := f (fst p) (snd p).

Notation "x .2" := (pr2 x) : fibration_scope.

Definition uncurry {A B C} (f : A → B → C) (p : A × B) : C := f (fst p) (snd p).

Composition of functions.

We put the following notation in a scope because leaving it unscoped causes it to override identical notations in other scopes. It's convenient to use the same notation for, e.g., function composition, morphism composition in a category, and functor composition, and let Coq automatically infer which one we mean by scopes. We can't do this if this notation isn't scoped. Unfortunately, Coq doesn't have a built-in function_scope like type_scope; type_scope is automatically opened wherever Coq is expecting a Sort, and it would be nice if function_scope were automatically opened whenever Coq expects a thing of type ∀ _, _ or _ → _. To work around this, we open function_scope globally.
We allow writing (f o g)%function to force function_scope over, e.g., morphism_scope.

This definition helps guide typeclass inference.

Composition of logical equivalences

Global Instance iff_compose : Transitive iff | 1

:= fun A B C f g ⇒ (fst g o fst f , snd f o snd g).

Arguments iff_compose {A B C} f g : rename.

:= fun A B C f g ⇒ (fst g o fst f , snd f o snd g).

Arguments iff_compose {A B C} f g : rename.

While we're at it, inverses of logical equivalences

Global Instance iff_inverse : Symmetric iff | 1

:= fun A B f ⇒ (snd f , fst f).

Arguments iff_inverse {A B} f : rename.

:= fun A B f ⇒ (snd f , fst f).

Arguments iff_inverse {A B} f : rename.

And reflexivity of them

Dependent composition of functions.

Definition composeD {A B C} (g : ∀ b, C b) (f : A → B) := fun x : A ⇒ g (f x).

Global Arguments composeD {A B C}%type_scope (g f)%function_scope x.

#[export] Hint Unfold composeD : core.

Notation "g 'oD' f" := (composeD g f) : function_scope.

Global Arguments composeD {A B C}%type_scope (g f)%function_scope x.

#[export] Hint Unfold composeD : core.

Notation "g 'oD' f" := (composeD g f) : function_scope.

## The groupoid structure of identity types.

Cumulative Inductive paths {A : Type} (a : A) : A → Type :=

idpath : paths a a.

Arguments idpath {A a} , [A] a.

Scheme paths_ind := Induction for paths Sort Type.

Arguments paths_ind [A] a P f y p : rename.

Scheme paths_rec := Minimality for paths Sort Type.

Arguments paths_rec [A] a P f y p : rename.

Register idpath as core.identity.refl.

Definition paths_rect := paths_ind.

Register paths_rect as core.identity.ind.

Notation "x = y :> A" := (@paths A x y) : type_scope.

Notation "x = y" := (x = y :>_) : type_scope.

idpath : paths a a.

Arguments idpath {A a} , [A] a.

Scheme paths_ind := Induction for paths Sort Type.

Arguments paths_ind [A] a P f y p : rename.

Scheme paths_rec := Minimality for paths Sort Type.

Arguments paths_rec [A] a P f y p : rename.

Register idpath as core.identity.refl.

Definition paths_rect := paths_ind.

Register paths_rect as core.identity.ind.

Notation "x = y :> A" := (@paths A x y) : type_scope.

Notation "x = y" := (x = y :>_) : type_scope.

Ensure internal_paths_rew and internal_paths_rew_r are defined outside sections, so they are not unnecessarily polymorphic.

Lemma paths_rew A a y P (X : P a) (H : a = y :> A) : P y.

Proof. rewrite <- H. exact X. Defined.

Lemma paths_rew_r A a y P (X : P y) (H : a = y :> A) : P a.

Proof. rewrite → H. exact X. Defined.

Register paths as core.identity.type.

Global Instance reflexive_paths {A} : Reflexive (@paths A) | 0 := @idpath A.

Arguments reflexive_paths / .

Proof. rewrite <- H. exact X. Defined.

Lemma paths_rew_r A a y P (X : P y) (H : a = y :> A) : P a.

Proof. rewrite → H. exact X. Defined.

Register paths as core.identity.type.

Global Instance reflexive_paths {A} : Reflexive (@paths A) | 0 := @idpath A.

Arguments reflexive_paths / .

Our identity type is the Paulin-Mohring style. We derive the Martin-Lof eliminator.

Definition paths_ind' {A : Type} (P : ∀ (a b : A), (a = b) → Type)

: (∀ (a : A), P a a idpath) → ∀ (a b : A) (p : a = b), P a b p.

Proof.

intros H ? ? [].

apply H.

Defined.

And here's the "right-sided" Paulin-Mohring eliminator.

Definition paths_ind_r {A : Type} (a : A)

(P : ∀ b : A, b = a → Type) (u : P a idpath)

: ∀ (y : A) (p : y = a), P y p.

Proof.

intros y p.

destruct p.

exact u.

Defined.

We declare a scope in which we shall place path notations. This way they can be turned on and off by the user.
We bind path_scope to paths so that when we are constructing arguments to things like concat, we automatically are in path_scope.

Bind Scope path_scope with paths.

Local Open Scope path_scope.

Local Open Scope path_scope.

The inverse of a path.

Definition inverse {A : Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) : y = x

:= match p with idpath ⇒ idpath end.

Register inverse as core.identity.sym.

:= match p with idpath ⇒ idpath end.

Register inverse as core.identity.sym.

Declaring this as simpl nomatch prevents the tactic simpl from expanding it out into match statements. We only want inverse to simplify when applied to an identity path.

Arguments inverse {A x y} p : simpl nomatch.

Global Instance symmetric_paths {A} : Symmetric (@paths A) | 0 := @inverse A.

Arguments symmetric_paths / .

Global Instance symmetric_paths {A} : Symmetric (@paths A) | 0 := @inverse A.

Arguments symmetric_paths / .

This allows rewrite to both in left-to-right and right-to left directions.

Definition paths_rect_r (A : Type) (x : A) (P : A → Type) (p : P x) (y : A) (e : paths y x) : P y :=

paths_rect A x (fun y e ⇒ P y) p y (inverse e).

paths_rect A x (fun y e ⇒ P y) p y (inverse e).

If we wanted to not have the constant symmetric_paths floating around, and wanted to resolve inverse directly, instead, we could play this trick, discovered by Georges Gonthier to fool Coq's restriction on Identity Coercions:
We define equality concatenation by destructing on both its arguments, so that it only computes when both arguments are idpath. This makes proofs more robust and symmetrical. Compare with the definition of identity_trans.

Module Export inverse. Definition inverse {A : Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) : y = x := match p with idpath => idpath end. End inverse. Module Type inverseT. Parameter inverse : forall {A}, Symmetric (@paths A). End inverseT. Module inverseSymmetric (inverse : inverseT). Global Existing Instance inverse.inverse. End inverseSymmetric. Module Export symmetric_paths := inverseSymmetric inverse.

Definition concat {A : Type} {x y z : A} (p : x = y) (q : y = z) : x = z :=

match p, q with idpath, idpath ⇒ idpath end.

See above for the meaning of simpl nomatch.

Arguments concat {A x y z} p q : simpl nomatch.

Global Instance transitive_paths {A} : Transitive (@paths A) | 0 := @concat A.

Arguments transitive_paths / .

Register concat as core.identity.trans.

Global Instance transitive_paths {A} : Transitive (@paths A) | 0 := @concat A.

Arguments transitive_paths / .

Register concat as core.identity.trans.

Note that you can use the Coq tactics reflexivity, transitivity, etransitivity, and symmetry when working with paths; we've redefined them above to use typeclasses and to unfold the instances so you get proof terms with concat and inverse.
The identity path.

The composition of two paths. We put p and q in path_scope explcitly. This is a partial work-around for https://coq.inria.fr/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3990, which is that implicitly bound scopes don't nest well.

The inverse of a path. See above about explicitly placing p in path_scope.

An alternative notation which puts each path on its own line, via the format specification in Notations.v. Useful as a temporary device during proofs of equalities between very long composites; to turn it on inside a section, say Open Scope long_path_scope.

An important instance of paths_ind is that given any dependent type, one can
transport P p u transports u : P x to P y along p : x = y.

*transport*elements of instances of the type along equalities in the base.
Definition transport {A : Type} (P : A → Type) {x y : A} (p : x = y) (u : P x) : P y :=

match p with idpath ⇒ u end.

match p with idpath ⇒ u end.

See above for the meaning of simpl nomatch.

Transport is very common so it is worth introducing a parsing notation for it. However, we do not use the notation for output because it hides the fibration, and so makes it very hard to read involved transport expression.

Having defined transport, we can use it to talk about what a homotopy theorist might see as "paths in a fibration over paths in the base"; and what a type theorist might see as "heterogeneous eqality in a dependent type".
We will first see this appearing in the type of apD.
Functions act on paths: if f : A → B and p : x = y is a path in A, then ap f p : f x = f y.
We typically pronounce ap as a single syllable, short for "application"; but it may also be considered as an acronym, "action on paths".

Definition ap {A B:Type} (f:A → B) {x y:A} (p:x = y) : f x = f y

:= match p with idpath ⇒ idpath end.

Global Arguments ap {A B}%type_scope f%function_scope {x y} p%path_scope.

Register ap as core.identity.congr.

We introduce the convention that apKN denotes the application of a K-path between functions to an N-path between elements, where a 0-path is simply a function or an element. Thus, ap is a shorthand for ap01.

Notation ap01 := ap (only parsing).

Definition pointwise_paths A (P : A → Type) (f g : ∀ x, P x)

:= ∀ x, f x = g x.

Definition pointwise_paths_concat {A} {P : A → Type} {f g h : ∀ x, P x}

: pointwise_paths A P f g → pointwise_paths A P g h

→ pointwise_paths A P f h := fun p q x ⇒ p x @ q x.

Global Instance reflexive_pointwise_paths A P

: Reflexive (pointwise_paths A P).

Proof.

intros ? ?; reflexivity.

Defined.

Global Instance transitive_pointwise_paths A P

: Transitive (pointwise_paths A P).

Proof.

intros f g h.

apply pointwise_paths_concat.

Defined.

Global Instance symmetric_pointwise_paths A P

: Symmetric (pointwise_paths A P).

Proof.

intros ? ? p ?; symmetry; apply p.

Defined.

Global Arguments pointwise_paths {A}%type_scope {P} (f g)%function_scope.

Global Arguments reflexive_pointwise_paths /.

Global Arguments transitive_pointwise_paths /.

Global Arguments symmetric_pointwise_paths /.

#[export]

Hint Unfold pointwise_paths : typeclass_instances.

Notation "f == g" := (pointwise_paths f g) : type_scope.

Definition apD10 {A} {B:A→Type} {f g : ∀ x, B x} (h:f=g)

: f == g

:= fun x ⇒ match h with idpath ⇒ 1 end.

Global Arguments apD10 {A%type_scope B} {f g}%function_scope h%path_scope _.

Definition ap10 {A B} {f g:A→B} (h:f=g) : f == g

:= apD10 h.

Global Arguments ap10 {A B}%type_scope {f g}%function_scope h%path_scope _.

For the benefit of readers of the HoTT Book:

Notation happly := ap10 (only parsing).

Definition ap11 {A B} {f g:A→B} (h:f=g) {x y:A} (p:x=y) : f x = g y.

Proof.

case h, p; reflexivity.

Defined.

Global Arguments ap11 {A B}%type_scope {f g}%function_scope h%path_scope {x y} p%path_scope.

Definition ap11 {A B} {f g:A→B} (h:f=g) {x y:A} (p:x=y) : f x = g y.

Proof.

case h, p; reflexivity.

Defined.

Global Arguments ap11 {A B}%type_scope {f g}%function_scope h%path_scope {x y} p%path_scope.

See above for the meaning of simpl nomatch.

Similarly, dependent functions act on paths; but the type is a bit more subtle. If f : ∀ a:A, B a and p : x = y is a path in A, then apD f p should somehow be a path between f x : B x and f y : B y. Since these live in different types, we use transport along p to make them comparable: apD f p : p # f x = f y.
The type p # f x = f y can profitably be considered as a heterogeneous or dependent equality type, of "paths from f x to f y over p".

Definition apD {A:Type} {B:A→Type} (f:∀ a:A, B a) {x y:A} (p:x=y):

p # (f x) = f y

:=

match p with idpath ⇒ idpath end.

See above for the meaning of simpl nomatch.

## Equivalences

Cumulative Class IsEquiv {A B : Type} (f : A → B) := {

equiv_inv : B → A ;

eisretr : f o equiv_inv == idmap ;

eissect : equiv_inv o f == idmap ;

eisadj : ∀ x : A, eisretr (f x) = ap f (eissect x) ;

}.

Arguments eisretr {A B}%type_scope f%function_scope {_} _.

Arguments eissect {A B}%type_scope f%function_scope {_} _.

Arguments eisadj {A B}%type_scope f%function_scope {_} _.

Arguments IsEquiv {A B}%type_scope f%function_scope.

equiv_inv : B → A ;

eisretr : f o equiv_inv == idmap ;

eissect : equiv_inv o f == idmap ;

eisadj : ∀ x : A, eisretr (f x) = ap f (eissect x) ;

}.

Arguments eisretr {A B}%type_scope f%function_scope {_} _.

Arguments eissect {A B}%type_scope f%function_scope {_} _.

Arguments eisadj {A B}%type_scope f%function_scope {_} _.

Arguments IsEquiv {A B}%type_scope f%function_scope.

We mark eisadj as Opaque to deter Coq from unfolding it when simplifying. Since proofs of eisadj typically have larger proofs than the rest of the equivalence data, we gain some speed up as a result.

A record that includes all the data of an adjoint equivalence.

Cumulative Record Equiv A B := {

equiv_fun : A → B ;

equiv_isequiv : IsEquiv equiv_fun

}.

Coercion equiv_fun : Equiv >-> Funclass.

Global Existing Instance equiv_isequiv.

Arguments equiv_fun {A B} _ _.

Arguments equiv_isequiv {A B} _.

Bind Scope equiv_scope with Equiv.

Notation "A <~> B" := (Equiv A B) : type_scope.

equiv_fun : A → B ;

equiv_isequiv : IsEquiv equiv_fun

}.

Coercion equiv_fun : Equiv >-> Funclass.

Global Existing Instance equiv_isequiv.

Arguments equiv_fun {A B} _ _.

Arguments equiv_isequiv {A B} _.

Bind Scope equiv_scope with Equiv.

Notation "A <~> B" := (Equiv A B) : type_scope.

A notation for the inverse of an equivalence. We can apply this to a function as long as there is a typeclass instance asserting it to be an equivalence. We can also apply it to an element of A <~> B, since there is an implicit coercion to A → B and also an existing instance of IsEquiv.

## Contractibility and truncation levels

- We prefer to reason about IsTrunc (S n) A rather than IsTrunc n (@paths A a b). Whenever we see a statement (or goal) about truncation of paths, we try to turn it into a statement (or goal) about truncation of a (non-paths) type. We do not allow typeclass resolution to go in the reverse direction from IsTrunc (S n) A to ∀ a b : A, IsTrunc n (a = b).
- We prefer to reason about syntactically smaller types. That is, typeclass instances should turn goals of type IsTrunc n (∀ a : A, P a) into goals of type ∀ a : A, IsTrunc n (P a); and goals of type IsTrunc n (A × B) into the pair of goals of type IsTrunc n A and IsTrunc n B; rather than the other way around. Ideally, we would add similar rules to transform hypotheses in the cases where we can do so. This rule is not always the one we want, but it seems to heuristically capture the shape of most cases that we want the typeclass machinery to automatically infer. That is, we often want to infer IsTrunc n (A × B) from IsTrunc n A and IsTrunc n B, but we (probably) don't often need to do other simple things with IsTrunc n (A × B) which are broken by that reduction.

### Contractibility

Cumulative Class Contr_internal (A : Type) := Build_Contr {

center : A ;

contr : (∀ y : A, center = y)

}.

Arguments center A {_}.

center : A ;

contr : (∀ y : A, center = y)

}.

Arguments center A {_}.

### Truncation levels

Inductive trunc_index : Type :=

| minus_two : trunc_index

| trunc_S : trunc_index → trunc_index.

Scheme trunc_index_ind := Induction for trunc_index Sort Type.

Scheme trunc_index_rec := Minimality for trunc_index Sort Type.

Definition trunc_index_rect := trunc_index_ind.

We will use Notation for trunc_indexes, so define a scope for them here.

Include the basic numerals, so we don't need to go through the coercion from nat, and so that we get the right binding with trunc_scope. Note that putting the negative numbers at level 0 allows us to override the - _ notation for negative numbers.

Notation "n .+1" := (trunc_S n) : trunc_scope.

Notation "n .+2" := (n.+1.+1)%trunc : trunc_scope.

Notation "n .+3" := (n.+1.+2)%trunc : trunc_scope.

Notation "n .+4" := (n.+1.+3)%trunc : trunc_scope.

Notation "n .+5" := (n.+1.+4)%trunc : trunc_scope.

Local Open Scope trunc_scope.

Notation "n .+2" := (n.+1.+1)%trunc : trunc_scope.

Notation "n .+3" := (n.+1.+2)%trunc : trunc_scope.

Notation "n .+4" := (n.+1.+3)%trunc : trunc_scope.

Notation "n .+5" := (n.+1.+4)%trunc : trunc_scope.

Local Open Scope trunc_scope.

Further notation for truncation levels is introducted in Trunc.v.
n-truncatedness is defined by recursion on n. We could simply define IsTrunc as a fixpoint and an Existing Class, but we want to also declare IsTrunc to be simpl nomatch, so that when we say simpl or cbn, IsTrunc n.+1 A doesn't get unfolded to ∀ x y:A, IsTrunc n (x = y). But we also want to be able to use this equality, e.g. by proving IsTrunc n.+1 A starting with intros x y, and if IsTrunc is a fixpoint declared as simpl nomatch then that doesn't work, because intros uses hnf to expose a ∀ and hnf respects simpl nomatch on fixpoints. But we can make it work if we define the fixpoint separately as IsTrunc_internal and then take the class IsTrunc to be a definitional wrapper around it, since hnf is willing to unfold non-fixpoints even if they are defined as simpl never. This behavior of hnf is arguably questionable (see https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/11619), but it is useful for us here.

Fixpoint IsTrunc_internal (n : trunc_index) (A : Type) : Type :=

match n with

| minus_two ⇒ Contr_internal A

| n'.+1 ⇒ ∀ (x y : A), IsTrunc_internal n' (x = y)

end.

Arguments IsTrunc_internal n A : simpl nomatch.

Class IsTrunc (n : trunc_index) (A : Type) : Type :=

Trunc_is_trunc : IsTrunc_internal n A.

We use the principle that we should always be doing typeclass resolution on truncation of non-equality types. We try to change the hypotheses and goals so that they never mention something like IsTrunc n (_ = _) and instead say IsTrunc (S n) _. If you're evil enough that some of your paths a = b are n-truncated, but others are not, then you'll have to either reason manually or add some (local) hints with higher priority than the hint below, or generalize your equality type so that it's not a path anymore.

#[global] Typeclasses Opaque IsTrunc.

Arguments IsTrunc : simpl never.

Global Instance istrunc_paths (A : Type) n `{H : IsTrunc n.+1 A} (x y : A)

: IsTrunc n (x = y)

:= H x y.

Existing Class IsTrunc_internal.

#[export]

Hint Extern 0 (IsTrunc_internal _ _) ⇒ progress change IsTrunc_internal with IsTrunc in × : typeclass_instances.

#[export]

Hint Extern 0 (IsTrunc _ _) ⇒ progress change IsTrunc_internal with IsTrunc in × : typeclass_instances.

Picking up the ∀ x y, IsTrunc n (x = y) instances in the hypotheses is much tricker. We could do something evil where we declare an empty typeclass like IsTruncSimplification and use the typeclass as a proxy for allowing typeclass machinery to factor nested ∀s into the IsTrunc via backward reasoning on the type of the hypothesis... but, that's rather complicated, so we instead explicitly list out a few common cases. It should be clear how to extend the pattern.

#[export]

Hint Extern 10 ⇒

progress match goal with

| [ H : ∀ x y : ?T, IsTrunc ?n (x = y) |- _ ]

⇒ change (IsTrunc n.+1 T) in H

| [ H : ∀ (a : ?A) (x y : @?T a), IsTrunc ?n (x = y) |- _ ]

⇒ change (∀ a : A, IsTrunc n.+1 (T a)) in H; cbv beta in H

| [ H : ∀ (a : ?A) (b : @?B a) (x y : @?T a b), IsTrunc ?n (x = y) |- _ ]

⇒ change (∀ (a : A) (b : B a), IsTrunc n.+1 (T a b)) in H; cbv beta in H

| [ H : ∀ (a : ?A) (b : @?B a) (c : @?C a b) (x y : @?T a b c), IsTrunc ?n (x = y) |- _ ]

⇒ change (∀ (a : A) (b : B a) (c : C a b), IsTrunc n.+1 (T a b c)) in H; cbv beta in H

| [ H : ∀ (a : ?A) (b : @?B a) (c : @?C a b) (d : @?D a b c) (x y : @?T a b c d), IsTrunc ?n (x = y) |- _ ]

⇒ change (∀ (a : A) (b : B a) (c : C a b) (d : D a b c), IsTrunc n.+1 (T a b c d)) in H; cbv beta in H

end : core.

Notation Contr := (IsTrunc minus_two).

Notation IsHProp := (IsTrunc minus_two.+1).

Notation IsHSet := (IsTrunc minus_two.+2).

#[export]

Hint Extern 0 ⇒ progress change Contr_internal with Contr in × : typeclass_instances.

Hint Extern 10 ⇒

progress match goal with

| [ H : ∀ x y : ?T, IsTrunc ?n (x = y) |- _ ]

⇒ change (IsTrunc n.+1 T) in H

| [ H : ∀ (a : ?A) (x y : @?T a), IsTrunc ?n (x = y) |- _ ]

⇒ change (∀ a : A, IsTrunc n.+1 (T a)) in H; cbv beta in H

| [ H : ∀ (a : ?A) (b : @?B a) (x y : @?T a b), IsTrunc ?n (x = y) |- _ ]

⇒ change (∀ (a : A) (b : B a), IsTrunc n.+1 (T a b)) in H; cbv beta in H

| [ H : ∀ (a : ?A) (b : @?B a) (c : @?C a b) (x y : @?T a b c), IsTrunc ?n (x = y) |- _ ]

⇒ change (∀ (a : A) (b : B a) (c : C a b), IsTrunc n.+1 (T a b c)) in H; cbv beta in H

| [ H : ∀ (a : ?A) (b : @?B a) (c : @?C a b) (d : @?D a b c) (x y : @?T a b c d), IsTrunc ?n (x = y) |- _ ]

⇒ change (∀ (a : A) (b : B a) (c : C a b) (d : D a b c), IsTrunc n.+1 (T a b c d)) in H; cbv beta in H

end : core.

Notation Contr := (IsTrunc minus_two).

Notation IsHProp := (IsTrunc minus_two.+1).

Notation IsHSet := (IsTrunc minus_two.+2).

#[export]

Hint Extern 0 ⇒ progress change Contr_internal with Contr in × : typeclass_instances.

### Simple induction

Ltac simple_induction n n' IH :=

generalize dependent n;

fix IH 1;

intros [| n'];

[ clear IH | specialize (IH n') ].

### Truncated relations

### Function extensionality

# That's not technically true; it might be possible to get non-parametric universe polymorphism using Modules and (Module) Functors; we can use functors to quantify over a Module Type which requires a polymorphic proof of a given hypothesis, and then use that hypothesis polymorphically in any theorem we prove in our new Module Functor. But that is far beyond the scope of this file.

Monomorphic Axiom Funext : Type0.

Existing Class Funext.

Axiom isequiv_apD10 : ∀ `{Funext} (A : Type) (P : A → Type) f g, IsEquiv (@apD10 A P f g).

Global Existing Instance isequiv_apD10.

Definition path_forall `{Funext} {A : Type} {P : A → Type} (f g : ∀ x : A, P x) :

f == g → f = g

:=

(@apD10 A P f g)^-1.

Global Arguments path_forall {_ A%type_scope P} (f g)%function_scope _.

Existing Class Funext.

Axiom isequiv_apD10 : ∀ `{Funext} (A : Type) (P : A → Type) f g, IsEquiv (@apD10 A P f g).

Global Existing Instance isequiv_apD10.

Definition path_forall `{Funext} {A : Type} {P : A → Type} (f g : ∀ x : A, P x) :

f == g → f = g

:=

(@apD10 A P f g)^-1.

Global Arguments path_forall {_ A%type_scope P} (f g)%function_scope _.

### Tactics

#[export] Hint Resolve idpath inverse : path_hints.

#[export] Hint Resolve idpath : core.

Ltac path_via mid :=

apply @concat with (y := mid); auto with path_hints.

#[export] Hint Resolve idpath : core.

Ltac path_via mid :=

apply @concat with (y := mid); auto with path_hints.

## Natural numbers

Local Set Elimination Schemes.

Natural numbers.

These schemes are therefore defined in Spaces.Nat

Declare Scope nat_scope.

Delimit Scope nat_scope with nat.

Bind Scope nat_scope with nat.

Arguments S _%nat.

Inductive Empty : Type0 := .

Register Empty as core.False.type.

Scheme Empty_ind := Induction for Empty Sort Type.

Scheme Empty_rec := Minimality for Empty Sort Type.

Definition Empty_rect := Empty_ind.

Definition not (A:Type) : Type := A → Empty.

Notation "~ x" := (not x) : type_scope.

Notation "~~ x" := (¬ ¬x) : type_scope.

#[export]

Hint Unfold not: core.

Notation "x <> y :> T" := (not (x = y :> T)) : type_scope.

Notation "x <> y" := (x ≠ y :> _) : type_scope.

Definition symmetric_neq {A} {x y : A} : x ≠ y → y ≠ x

:= fun np p ⇒ np (p^).

Definition complement {A} (R : Relation A) : Relation A :=

fun x y ⇒ ¬ (R x y).

#[global] Typeclasses Opaque complement.

Class Irreflexive {A} (R : Relation A) :=

irreflexivity : Reflexive (complement R).

Class Asymmetric {A} (R : Relation A) :=

asymmetry : ∀ {x y}, R x y → (complement R y x : Type).

Register Empty as core.False.type.

Scheme Empty_ind := Induction for Empty Sort Type.

Scheme Empty_rec := Minimality for Empty Sort Type.

Definition Empty_rect := Empty_ind.

Definition not (A:Type) : Type := A → Empty.

Notation "~ x" := (not x) : type_scope.

Notation "~~ x" := (¬ ¬x) : type_scope.

#[export]

Hint Unfold not: core.

Notation "x <> y :> T" := (not (x = y :> T)) : type_scope.

Notation "x <> y" := (x ≠ y :> _) : type_scope.

Definition symmetric_neq {A} {x y : A} : x ≠ y → y ≠ x

:= fun np p ⇒ np (p^).

Definition complement {A} (R : Relation A) : Relation A :=

fun x y ⇒ ¬ (R x y).

#[global] Typeclasses Opaque complement.

Class Irreflexive {A} (R : Relation A) :=

irreflexivity : Reflexive (complement R).

Class Asymmetric {A} (R : Relation A) :=

asymmetry : ∀ {x y}, R x y → (complement R y x : Type).

Inductive Unit : Type0 := tt : Unit.

Scheme Unit_ind := Induction for Unit Sort Type.

Scheme Unit_rec := Minimality for Unit Sort Type.

Definition Unit_rect := Unit_ind.

Scheme Unit_ind := Induction for Unit Sort Type.

Scheme Unit_rec := Minimality for Unit Sort Type.

Definition Unit_rect := Unit_ind.

#[export]

Hint Resolve tt : core.

Register Unit as core.IDProp.type.

Register Unit as core.True.type.

Register tt as core.IDProp.idProp.

Register tt as core.True.I.

Hint Resolve tt : core.

Register Unit as core.IDProp.type.

Register Unit as core.True.type.

Register tt as core.IDProp.idProp.

Register tt as core.True.I.

Class IsPointed (A : Type) := point : A.

#[global] Typeclasses Transparent IsPointed.

Arguments point A {_}.

Cumulative Record pType :=

{ pointed_type : Type ;

ispointed_type : IsPointed pointed_type }.

Coercion pointed_type : pType >-> Sortclass.

Global Existing Instance ispointed_type.

#[global] Typeclasses Transparent IsPointed.

Arguments point A {_}.

Cumulative Record pType :=

{ pointed_type : Type ;

ispointed_type : IsPointed pointed_type }.

Coercion pointed_type : pType >-> Sortclass.

Global Existing Instance ispointed_type.

Definition hfiber {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (y : B) := { x : A & f x = y }.

Global Arguments hfiber {A B}%type_scope f%function_scope y.

Ltac easy :=

let rec use_hyp H :=

match type of H with

| _ ⇒ try solve [inversion H]

end

with do_intro := let H := fresh in intro H; use_hyp H

with destruct_hyp H := case H; clear H; do_intro; do_intro in

let rec use_hyps :=

match goal with

| H : _ |- _ ⇒ solve [inversion H]

| _ ⇒ idtac

end in

let rec do_atom :=

solve [reflexivity | symmetry; trivial] ||

contradiction ||

(split; do_atom)

with do_ccl := trivial; repeat do_intro; do_atom in

(use_hyps; do_ccl) || fail "Cannot solve this goal".

Tactic Notation "now" tactic(t) := t; easy.